Head to head

GLM 5.3 vs Kimi K3

GLM 5.3 leads on 7 of 11 shared benchmarks.

GPQA Diamond88.1% · 92.9%
Kimi K3 leads
HLE42% · 43.5%
Kimi K3 leads
Terminal-Bench 2.188.2% · 88.3%
Kimi K3 leads
Terminal-Bench 3.028.3% · 17.7%
GLM 5.3 leads
Terminal-Bench 4.037.9% · 12.6%
GLM 5.3 leads
DeepSWE v1.166.9% · 67.5%
Kimi K3 leads

GLM 5.3 leads on 7 of 11 shared benchmarks.

DimensionGLM 5.3Kimi K3
GPQA Diamond88.1%92.9%
HLE42%43.5%
MathArena Apex—65.6%
Terminal-Bench 2.188.2%88.3%
Terminal-Bench 3.028.3%17.7%
Terminal-Bench 4.037.9%12.6%
DeepSWE v1.166.9%67.5%
ProgramBench19%17.5%
NL2Repo-Bench58%58%
CyberGym84.5%80%
ExploitGym15%—
HLE (w/tools)62.5%59.8%
Automation-Bench48.8%46.7%
Agents' Last Exam28.5%27.6%
Chartography (w/tools)—68.1%
BabyVision (w/tools)—85.7%
ZeroBench-main (w/tools)—41%
Blended price——
Full priceInput · Output · Cached input——
Context window——
——

What your usage would cost

Adjust the monthly volume — every model recomputes instantly.

GLM 5.3
—
Kimi K3
—

Estimates use list prices and ignore cached input, batch discounts, and off-peak rates.

Popular comparisons